In the majority of road traffic accident
claims there is always someone at fault, therefore there is usually no doubt of
being able to prove liability. In some accidents the liability is obvious and
non-fault accident victims have little or no difficulty in proving liability.
For example, if the car behind you crashed into you then according the Highway
Regulations the driver will be found liable as everyone should maintain a safe distance
from the vehicle in front. However, some cases are difficult to judge in terms
of liability which may necessitate legal assistance if the insurance companies
have not yet settled the road traffic
accident claim between themselves.
What
do Insurers Recommend?
All insurers recommend that you should
never admit responsibility for the accident without speaking to them first.
Your silence in this regard helps them defend your case regardless of your
liability. If your accept liability right away, the other driver will have a
better chance of winning the RoadTraffic Accident Claim.
What
is the Difference between “Fault Claim” and “Non-Fault Claim”:-
The difference between a fault claim and
non-fault claim depends on whether your solicitor/insurer can recover the costs
of damages from the third party. If the costs can be recovered then it will be
considered a Non-Fault Claim and if the costs cannot be recovered then a “fault
claim” will be made.
For more information you are more than
welcome to, get in touch with the road traffic
accident claim experts at 247
Solicitors by phone on 01204 263000 or email info@247solicitors.co.uk
Just admiring your work and wondering how you managed this blog so well. It’s so remarkable that I can't afford to not go through this valuable information whenever I surf the internet!交通意外索償
ReplyDeleteYes, usually in "Fault claims", it is very easy to prove the liability. Most of the accident claims cases where one party is at fault and the other party is able to proof who's at fault, those cases are resolved outside the court.
ReplyDelete